|
<< Click to Display Table of Contents >> Navigation: Telegram > 2018 > 04 > 07 > Telegram_2018-04-07T12 |
2018-04-07T12:26:55
Bootstrap os awesome.but is not Delphi,I expect in the future to do awesome things writing only pascal,even bootstrap if
2018-04-07T12:26:55
Someone wraps it and make IW components that can be dropped in a form
2018-04-07T12:34:13
But if IWCL will I really need something like Bootstrap,will they share the same update strategy like Redux?
2018-04-07T12:34:13
One of the Reasons I really believe in the future of IW is tge fact that we re going to write only DELPHI.this simplifies things and make mugrations faster.I mean someone who wants to migrate a single desktop app to IW can do up 90% of the job with a tool provided dont having alien code mixed with DELPHI
2018-04-07T12:34:35
^Bingo
2018-04-07T12:34:40
You wont need Boostrap
2018-04-07T12:34:55
IW17 has its own layouts, but you can still use BS if you want.
2018-04-07T12:35:06
IW17 is easier to mix into existing frameworks.
2018-04-07T12:35:14
Comps are FAR easier to write too.
2018-04-07T12:35:36
not familiar with redux update strategy, so cant comment.
2018-04-07T12:37:18
Those that are using Bootstrap will have the same level of mantainability,and will migrate to IW 17 as easy as those who dont?
2018-04-07T12:38:42
17 runs in a paralell mode - ie 14 stuff runs as is..
2018-04-07T12:38:56
so path will be same for all, BS or not.